|
Home
Hanspeter Kuenzler
Interviews available
2012 News, Plans and general Musings
2012 HPK's Playlist
2011 News, Plans & General Prattle
HPK's Playlist
2010: News, plans and prattle
2009 News, Plans and General Prattle 2009
Der Thriller um Michael Jackson
Interview Ron Sexsmith
Interview Orchestre Poly-Rhythmo de Catanou
Interview Anna Calvi
Interview Cathal Coughlan
Interview Jon Langford of the Mekons
Interview Paddy McAloon
Interview Chris Blackwell
Interview Bonnie Prince Billy
Interview Robyn Hitchcock
Interview Paul Weller, April 2008
Story: How the punks saved English football
Story: Lost Voices
Story: Mit Schirm, Charme und Brass
Fiction Hotel California
Links
Contact
|
Interview: Chris Blackwell, 26-5-2009 ![]() Fifty years ago exactly, Chris Blackwell famously founded the record label Island Records. With the taste and the vision of a founder raised partly in Jamaica and partly in England, the label exerted a profound influence on the development of British Rock and Folk music from the sixties and well into the eighties. Island was also the first company to properly open European ears to the pleasures of Reggae. Not to mention Grace Jones, Tom Waits and King Sunny Ade. 1998 Blackwell sold the company - eventually it ended up with Universal Records. He has nevertheless agreed to participate in the festivities celebrating the anniversary. Do you feel Jamaican or British? Oh, Jamaican, definitely. I was born here, went to Jamaica when I was six months old, came back to school when I was eight, went back to Jamaica when I was nine, came back to school here when I was ten, and left back to Jamaica when I was seventeen. I couldn't resist the temptation to bring along the oldest Island records in my collection (albums by Byron Lee & The Dragonaires and Millie & Jackie Edwards). Look at this! That's so funny. That is something! This is my old girlfriend (on the Byron Lee sleeve). Esther Anderson. She also took a very famous picture of Bob. He (Byron Lee) died last year. Wow, this is the 5th record! The 5th album we put out in England. Do you have a copy of all your stuff? No. Why not? I'm not a collector. I'm just not a collector. I wish I did now. But I was always looking forward and never really collecting stuff as I went along. Did you ever have - early on or later - a sense of history whilst you were making all these albums? Never. I was always thinking of how to what ever I was working on at the time. You do something and then you're working on something else and then you're working on something else, and there's always something new you want to get happening. That's always the way I was thinking. Still is. It's just that this time I'm on pause for a little bit now with this "Island 50th" where I'm now looking back because of the celebration, but normally I'm just looking forward. How does that feel, this looking back business? I'm enjoying it. I really am enjoying it. As I said, I'm always looking forward, I've never stopped to look back, and now as I'm forced to in a way I feel great about it. It seems like a large body of work, really. I feel great about it. I feel proud about it. Isn't it odd, the last 10 years it's been a very different company than you left behind. Doesn't it feel a bit odd having someone else putting on the laurels you earned? Well, once you sell a company or a house or anything it's no longer yours, it's the people's who bought it. I think the first thing is - at least they kept the name. Cause there's been so many great labels that have disappeared. A&M has disappeared. Stax. Some of the great labels in the past - ones that I wanted to emulate, King Records, Imperial Records, a lot of great labels don't exist any more. The first thing then, I'm thrilled that Island still exists. And also, at least in England, they've maintained a kind of a culture. It can't be the same as it was. Cause when something is independently owned it has a different kind of spirit. The whole thing works differently. There's not a lot of people having to sign off on things, it's a different kind of thing, things move faster. But once something becomes part of a corporation it automatically gets more structured and it's not quite the same fun. But still the people at Island, they're still signing some very interesting things. If I'd owned Island I'd have loved to sign Amy Winehouse. She epitomizes a kind of Island act.I think it's great. I hope it lasts another 20, 30 years, whatever. When you started off, did you fall into it cause you were a music fan, or cause of friends who were involved? I started it purely cause I was a music fan. I loved music. I loved being around musicians, I loved good musicianship, and just like a fan of music, where the fan really wants to get backstage because they want to get closer to it, I was just like that in a sense. So to have the opportunity to be able to speak to someone and say "I'd like to make a record with you", and they said "yes", that was really exciting for me, cause now I was really getting closer to it. Getting as close as you could possibly get, so when I took them into the studio, and they do a couple of couple of takes, and they said "what do you think", and I said what I thought - who knew, I had no qualifications to produce anybody, but I just felt that one was a little better than the other, and I'd say that, and they'd say "OK". I was part of it. I'd gone from being on the outside to being on the inside in little bit. I was in heaven. And I stayed that way for pretty much all the time. The excitement must have been amazing. You had one over pretty much everyone else in Britain except the Jamaicans here, you knew the fantastic nature of Jamaican music. Did it feel a bit like being a preacher, teaching the Brits Reggae? Well, firstly, the Brits didn't buy the music at all at first. Only the Jamaicans. When I started in 1962, 63, 64. Maybe 65 was when the records first started to sell to some of the English. But in the evenings, socially, I'd play my records for friends, and a lot of them really loved them because they'd never heard anything like it. Because, you know, there never was anything like it before. A lot of people really really enjoyed them. The record that was most popular was this record "We'll Meet" by Roy & Millie. This little girl came on in the second verse of the song, she had this very high pitched and funny voice, and everyone said, "I've got to have that record". That encouraged me to bring her over to England to see if I could make a record with her here because her voice was so distinctive. And it was very successful. Who picked the song, "My Boy Lollipop"? "My Boy Lollipop" was a song that had been released in 1957, something like that. I used to go up to New York. That was around the time when I made my first record, in Jamaica, with a band that was playing in the Half Moon Hotel. When I made that record, an album, I went to New York to get it mastered and get the cover done and everything. I would go New York now and again and buy records and sell them to the sound system guys in Jamaica. One of these record's was the original version of "My Boy Lollipop". But I'd make a copy of each one on a reel to reel tape, it was before cassettes, and when I brought Millie over to England I sat down trying to work out if we could find a song for her, and I found this tape which had the original version of "My Boy Lollipop" on it. And I said, "that's the song we should do". So it was really really lucky that I found the tape. Who was that first band you recorded an album with? They were called Lance Haywood Quartet. I was a Jazz fan. I was always a Jazz fan. How did your conversion to Rock come about? You see, Rock itself was interesting. What I was never really into was Pop, I was never a Pop person. Rock was a little bit the anti-thesis to Pop when it first emerged. With Pop, you never really talked about the musicianship, but when Rock came in it had guitarists, and a lot of instrumentation. It was a different approach. The songs were longer. The whole thing was just a different approach when it first came in. A fresh approach. It was very Anti-Pop in a sense. People didn't really wear costumes to go on stage, they just went on stage in whatever clothes they were wearing. It was a very different approach. And I reacted very strongly to that, cause it was great to hear - for example - like a Steve Winwood, he was an incredible musician, an incredible keyboard, organ, guitar player. So, again I was working with musicians, with music. Those were the people I was working with. I'd imagine the first Free demo must have been pretty interesting? It wasn't a demo. I was never into demos. I never asked anybody to do demos for me. I made a decision to sign an artist and then let them record what they wanted to record. That was always my policy. A very different policy to the one that exists now. It was my policy and it worked pretty well. My approach was really different. I was more in the artist business than record business. I was interested in signing an artist, and building and developing an artist's career. And the records would be milestones in that career. Certainly you were looking for the best record, and you're looking for something that could jump out and create a hit, provided that hit is in the spirit and style and feel of that artist. You didn't want a hit that didn't really represent him because you'd go off course. I never really listened to demos. I reckoned - I came from Jazz - whatever they want to play, let them play it. If they're good, they'll play good things. Did it cheese you off in any way that you had Free and Spooky Tooth and other fantastic rock bands but the real rock money was made elsewhere, with Led Zeppelin for instance? Nono. Never. Believe it or not, I was never chasing after big hits. I was chasing after finding different type of talent. Original type of talent I felt I could work with for a long time. That was always my interest. Always my interest! It was specifically my interest after Millie and "My Boy Lollipop". Even though it was a very important record in my life, as without that who knows what would have happened! That was the record that got me a foot in the door in the general music business. But there was not really any great satisfaction. I felt I'd done a good job but then I wasn't able to sustain that with her. I felt very bad to open up somebody like what happened with her, she had such a big hit and became a big star - and then it felt terrible not to be able to sustain it. I didn't like that. Did she take it badly? I don't know if she took it badly, but there was clearly a disappointment of being on the front every newspaper, as she was, with the Beatles. At the time it was The Beatles and after that it was her. To go from there to being sort of disregarded - I felt bad about that. I felt in a sense almost guilty, really. It was something that in the future I wanted to avoid. Thereafter I was always interest in people I felt could have a long-term-career. You were in a difficult position with a lot of the musicians you worked with, particularly reggae musicians. They weren't well educated and often didn't understand their contracts. If things didn't work out the way they'd imagined or liked, they'd blame you and say quite unpleasant things. Lee Perry for instance. How painful was that? Not really. Lee Perry did say some negative things about me. But do you know something? I love Lee Perry. I really do. I love him. I learnt more from him than anybody else I worked with. Anybody anywhere. I learned more from just watching him work. And from his point of view, I can understand why he'd be upset. I did a lot of records with him, and then when he had a record we didn't like I didn't take it. And I think from his point of view he probably felt that I was not being loyal to him. I can understand that. I was never upset about that. I really was never upset about it, because underneath it all deeply I care about him, and I know he cares about me. What do you think of what?s happened with Reggae in recent years? Well, Reggae in recent years - it's so different from what it was in the 70s. Reggae in the 70s had such a cultural element to it. Such a social consciousness to it. And recently it has not had that. It's quite the opposite. A lot of the material is just negative, or just crass. But I'm talking as a 70plus year old guy, it doesn't interest me that much. Haha. In the 60s, do you think the fact that everybody was learning on the spot, managers weren't yet the specially trained managers of today, everybody was improvising - was that a part of making it such a rich tapestry, the fact that people improvised more? Absolutely it was! Everybody was learning on the chop, everybody was learning, a new business was being created as we went along. With everybody, not just with the musicians, with the managers, it was an incredibly exciting time, because you were breaking new ground. Nothing had ever existed like this before. It was very Jazz. It was very improvisational. I've always been a Jazz person, in my head and in the way I feel, so it was a very exciting time. I ultimately sold Island Records because the Jazz had gone out of it, for want of a better word. It was all very structured and corporate and people worried about their titles and that kind of thing which didn't interest me at all. In the wake of Island every major label founded a progressive pseudo indie indie label, Vertigo, Dawn, Harvest etc. All faded away after a few years. What did you have that those didn't have? What was the advantage? We were real. They weren't real. When a large corporation has a so-called independent label it very rarely has a chance of doing anything. You can't imbue a label with a kind of independent culture when really it reports to their board of directors who're interested in their quarterly numbers and their quarterly figures. Island had a couple of Rap things, but not that many, even though Island had opened the way for experimental black music with Reggae. But you didn't put out too much rap.What was the reason? We didn't put out too much. We did put out one of the best rap albums of all time, though, which was Eric B. & Rakim, "Paid in Full". Also we made this deal with these two brothers in California who had a label called Delicious Vinyl. And we had a couple of huge hits with them, Young MC and Tone Loc, particularly Tone Loc was huge. But in general, no. Partly because - I was in a sense in the center when Reggae started to break, but I was not in the center when Rap music started to break. I was around, but more on the periphery. A friend of mine, Tom Silverman, he had a very strong label, Tommy Boy. And there were some other labels, but we weren't at the center of it. Being such a Jazz fan, well, there was Antilles, which was a kind of Jazz department of Island, but why did you not push Jazz music more? You know something? I always thought in the 60s, when Rock came in, and there was the musicianship with Rock, that Rock did a lot to cause the demise of Jazz. A lot of rock musicians became a bit like pop stars, but they were still musicians. People would see them on TV or see them live, and talk about incredible guitar solos, or incredible keyboard solos, but that was in a more popular kind of music, they were more structured songs. So I think Jazz lost its importance. When Jazz was at its most important it was the only place where you could hear musicianship other than classical music. You couldn't hear it in Pop, but you could hear great music played by the Jazz masters. That was my theory. Also, I couldn't really find anything that got me that excited. My favourite artists in Jazz were Dexter Gordon, Miles Davis, Coltrane, Jimmy Smith. Going right back to Jellyroll Morton, Louis Armstrong. I couldn't find anything that was different. I guess some of the things that were trying to be different I didn't really like. As a man who grew up with vinyl, how do you get on with MP3 and downloading and all that? MP3 is just a very inferior sound reproduction. It's much more inferior than the cassette was, and people used to complain about cassettes in the old days. I think the whole way people store and consume music is totally different, and that's the way it will be for the future. What I'm waiting for, and it's just around the corner, is when the files are all uncompressed, and when they sell the music for a lot lot less than they're selling it now. Once it's possible to find with a little research to find anything you want and be able to download it for free, you can't then ask for a dollar a track, which is what you were selling a regular song before. You can't really do that. I'm waiting for that to happen, and when that happens I think the record business will take off again, and if it's not compressed files the sound will be great. How do you envisage artists to survive financially? I think artists will survive on the sales of records, and also it will be not dissimilar to how it was in old days where a Duke Ellington or a Count Basie would hope to get a hit cause they'd then get $ 1000 or 2000 more a night for their shows. It's gonna be much more orientated towards personal appearances. But when as I say when they reduce the price and make the quality better I think it will be possible to sell many millions of records because it will be so inexpensive to pick it up. The obvious question - which are the half a dozen or so records you think on which Island and the artist really succeeded? One that immediately springs to mind is "Tea for the Tillerman", Cat Stevens. "Exodus" by Bob Marley, and maybe another one, "Catch a Fire" by Bob Marley, because it was the start of something new. The start of moving Reggae into a rock sensibility. "Joshua Tree". "Broken English", Marianne Faithful. Quite a few more. I'm missing the folky stuff. The folky stuff? Well, "Five Leaves Left", for sure. "Solid Air", John Martyn. It's hard. I hate being asked that because I'm gonna leave out something that later I'll think I can't believe I left that out. "Juju Music" byKing Sunny Ade? "Juju Music", absolutely! That's what started us on our whole African catalogue. In some ways that seemed riskier than what you did with Reggae. At that stage African music in London, you could go to Stern's, the electrical goods shop in Tottenham Court Road, and there'd be a rack at the back with five Fela Kuti albums, and that was it. Nobody had access to African music, the awareness outside the relatively small African expat communities was small.. Yes, but you see, to me it wasn't risky. I thought as a Jazz label. Do you know what I mean? You're not expecting to sell a million copies. You just want to record something that is really good and it will stand the test of time if it's really good, and you'll do your best to try and widen its market. But the main thing is to say: OK, this maybe in the first year will sell 50'000, and then you then figure, OK, the cost of this should be related to what you think you can generate from the 50'000. I would never think of it so much as that I had to make profit, I would think that I was looking to recover my investment. I always thought like that, which was not the best way of thinking from a business point of view. I thought like that because I thought somebody I really wanted to record because they were really interesting and really talented, so the first thing I asked was "can I feel I support this?". I was never thinking "this will go to the top of the charts and will sell a million records". Funnily enough, this was something you did well, have interesting music that somehow still ended up at the top of the charts. Hahaha. Yes! I know. I think what Island was able to achieve was building a credible brand, especially from about 1968 until 1975, especially at that point in time, where people would think "if it's on Island, let me hear it, it's probably good". That was a thing I wanted to emulate. When I used to go to New York and buy these records which I used to scratch off the label and sell to sound system guys, whenever I came to an Atlantic record I'd immediately pick it up and listen to it. And if I listened to it and didn't like it I'd doubt my own taste. I'd never doubt the taste of Atlantic Records. I always remember thinking that and saying: "that's what I'd really like to get to if I had a label". That's the reason to have a label. The only reason to have a label is as a filter system in some way. Hopefully create something where there's a credibility where people will follow that cause they feel they're not gonna be disappointed. And for a while we had that. |
